Skill#comps#valuation#multiples#peers
Comparable Company Valuation

Build a structured comps table with EV/Revenue, EV/EBITDA, P/E, and P/FCF multiples across peers to derive an implied valuation range.
by Capital Deck Team0 likes0 copies
## Comparable Company Valuation (Comps)

**Target**: {COMPANY} ({TICKER})

---

**STEP 1 — SELECT PEER GROUP**
Identify 3–5 publicly traded peers with similar:
- Business model and revenue mix
- Geographic footprint
- Size (revenue within 0.5x–2x range preferred)
- Growth profile

| Peer Company | Ticker | Revenue ($M) | Why Comparable |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.           |        |              |                |
| 2.           |        |              |                |
| 3.           |        |              |                |
| 4.           |        |              |                |
| 5.           |        |              |                |

---

**STEP 2 — TRADING MULTIPLES TABLE**
*(NTM = Next Twelve Months estimates)*

| Company      | EV/Rev | EV/EBITDA | P/E  | P/FCF | EV/EBIT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peer 1       |        |           |      |       |         |
| Peer 2       |        |           |      |       |         |
| Peer 3       |        |           |      |       |         |
| Peer 4       |        |           |      |       |         |
| Peer 5       |        |           |      |       |         |
| **Median**   |        |           |      |       |         |
| **Mean**     |        |           |      |       |         |
| {TICKER}     |        |           |      |       |         |
| vs. Median   | +/-___ | +/-___    |+/-%  |+/-%   |+/-___   |

---

**STEP 3 — IMPLIED VALUE RANGE**
Apply median peer multiples to {TICKER}'s financials:

| Multiple Used | {TICKER} Metric | Peer Median | Implied EV ($M) | Implied Price ($) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV/Revenue    | $___M rev       | ___x        |                 |                   |
| EV/EBITDA     | $___M EBITDA    | ___x        |                 |                   |
| P/E           | $___  EPS       | ___x        |                 |                   |
| P/FCF         | $___  FCF/sh    | ___x        |                 |                   |

**Implied price range**: $___ – $___ (weighted avg: $___)
**Current price**: $___ | **Discount / Premium**: ___%

---

**STEP 4 — QUALITY ADJUSTMENTS**
- Does {TICKER} deserve a premium or discount vs. peers?

[ ] Higher ROIC than median → Premium justified
[ ] Faster revenue growth (>5pts above median) → Premium justified
[ ] Lower margins / worse profitability → Discount warranted
[ ] Higher leverage → Discount warranted
[ ] Better management track record → slight Premium

**Adjustment**: +/- ___% | **Adjusted fair value**: $___